Archive for May 31st, 2011
where can i come up with alot of money in short time?
i need to come up with 10-20 thousand dollars within the next 2 months. the problem is im a disabled young woman in my 20s.i dont have money and i cannot work because of mobility trouble,i have a hard time walking and major health problems, nothing i can enter a medical trial just mainly a cardiac thing and bone fracture/muscle things and chronic pains.
i have about 400 dollars saved up. i do not have a bank account right now. im living for free with my parents while i recuperate which will take a long time probably over a year or more. i get basic stuff like food and basic necessities for free, i do not own a car or any valuable gold or gem jewelery.
i need to come up with charity for myself because i have a bad situation.i need to get my entire mouth redone.i have 90% of my teeth decayed and many missing and broken teeth. i look funny when i smile because of the missing teeth and im a young woman not an 8 yr old girl. i should not have missing teeth.
i need root canals on 85% of all my teeth, ill need major cosmetic work, bridges, implants, caps, major dental reconstruction. and it has to be done by a good and well knowledged dentist who knows what they are doing. so chances are it will be expensive and the dental work will take like a year to get everything done.
if i go to a cheap dentist or a less expensive one chances are they will tell me to have my teeth pulled and have dentures put in… thats not happening- as long as i come up with money
i really do not want dentures at my young age. there are cosmetic things that can be done, just most dentists are not willing to do such extensive cosmetic work, or they will tell me to have partial dentures or something. i was told by a few less expensive dentists that they would need to do root canals on all my teeth and pull many teeth..
but i know this is not necessary
i did find a dentist or two that are able to save my teeth and do excellent cosmetic densitry to rebuild my teeth, and they said some of my teeth do not need root canals and they are able to create white and perfect matching white teeth that will look real, white caps…not metal ones
anyhow so i need to invest in good teeth, just the total amount to have them fixed with be 10′s of thousands of dollars.
dental insurance dosnt cover this
to even get started on a few teeth it will be like 5 thousand dollars the first few visits, to have the bridegs and crowns name and to match my teeth shade
so i need to come up with money. i need creative ways. i cannot work or walk very well.
i have no family members willing to give me any money.
i have no savings or inheritance from anyone. i cant take out a loan right now for another reason
what are some ways i can make money
i dont want to participate in any medical tests, do not want to give blood or any thing like that,i dont want to do anything illegal such as sell drugs, nothing that would risk my non exhistent criminal record, dignity or anything else
how do i make a few thousand dollars if i cant work.i cant get workers compensation because i never had a job and i was a college student when i got injured
Tim
If it is life at conception, then what about the babies and children that die? How about it McCain and Palin?
fictional account based on facts:
We live in Africa. Our baby was born 10 months ago. We have no resources to feed the child. Now my wife is pregnant and there is no food anywhere. In fact 10 million of my neighbors died last year from lack of food and medical resources. Thank God there are laws against abortion and birth control because they are murder. I am so glad there are people like John McCain and Sarah Palin to stop the killing of these fetuses.
It seems we are having more babies than we can feed. I know this is God smiling on us with the gift of life. But how do we feed the fetuses and what do we do with the 10 million dead babies?
The group estimates that in 2005, 9.7 million children under five died, mostly from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhea, malaria and neonatal causes of death.
http://www.who.int/child_adolescent_health/data/child/en/index.html
You cannot save a fetus without killing a child. http://www.prolifeismurder.com
Edit:
From the answers, it seems that the only thing we can do is elect John and Sarah and let the kids die. I guess they think it is smarter to let them be born, then die before the age of five. I guess that makes sense to someone. And suffering, who cares? At least John and Sarah can go down in history as the pair that made the evil abortions go away. Abortion bad, torture babies good, ugh.
preg christian:
You know the point I am making and as usual you attempt to hoodwink other readers. I am opposed to forced birth and am not opposed to a person that wants a child keeping a child. You know already that my intent is to stop people like you that want to force your views into law from having the ability to do so. And I do that by making it clear that when a person such as yourself forces the birth of a fetus it causes the death of a child. But you don’t want people to know that because you are pro lifer that wants all fetuses to be born and you let them die thereafter.
And you also know that I have 4 kids that I raised and fed and educated with college degrees when wanted. And I donate my time trying to save the kids you kill.
Please keep following me around on answers, I would block you, but you are my best source of a stalker with kooky ideas.
celeste;
You ruined your own answer. Yes abortions cost money, but not as much as feeding a human through out their life. You won’t pay unless you outlaw aboriton. Then not only will you pay, humans will die.
Shantel Hierro
I believe Ann Coulter is right. Can anyone prove she is wrong? I bet you can’t?
Prescription For Disaster Now Covered Under Obamacare
by Ann Coulter
03/31/2010
On the “Today” show this Tuesday, President Obama claimed the massive government takeover of health care the Democrats passed without a single Republican vote was a “middle of the road” bill that incorporated many Republican ideas.
One Republican idea allegedly incorporated into the Democrats’ health care monstrosity is “medical malpractice reform.” Needless to say, the Democrats’ idea of malpractice reform is less than nothing. Until trial lawyers are screaming bloody murder, there has been no medical malpractice reform.
The Democrats’ “malpractice” section merely encourages the states to set up commissions to “study” tort reform, in the sense that frustrated mothers “encourage” their kids not to slouch. By “study,” the Democrats mean “ignore.”
So we get more taxpayer-funded government workers under the Democrats’ “medical malpractice reform,” but not one tittle of actual reform.
Democrats manifestly do not care about helping Americans get quality health care. If they did, they could not continue to support trial lawyers like John Edwards making $50 million by bringing junk lawsuits against doctors who are saving people’s lives. (At least Edwards has not done anything else to publicly disgrace himself since then.)
At a minimum, any health care bill that purports to improve Americans’ health, rather than trial lawyers’ bank accounts, must include a loser-pays rule and a restriction on damages to actual losses — as opposed to punitive damages, which mostly serve to enrich the John Edwardses of the world, and their mistresses.
The Democrats also lyingly claim their health care reform includes the Republican ideas of competition across state lines.
I know they’re lying because — well, first because I read the bill — but also because Democrats are genetically incapable of understanding the free market. You might say it’s a pre-existing condition with them.
True, you can buy insurance across state lines under the new health insurance law — but only after the Democrats have created a national commission telling all insurance companies what they are required to cover.
That’s not as bad as the current patchwork of state mandates — it’s worse!
At least before the passage of ObamaCare you could move to states such as Idaho or Kentucky, where all insurance plans aren’t required to cover fertility treatment, restless leg syndrome and social anxiety disorder.
Under federal mandates, there will be no escape.
That’s right, a single, one-size-fits-all, jammed-down-your-throat national plan is what the Democrats mean when they say their plan includes “competition across state lines.”
How much do you want to bet that the national commission in Washington will mandate coverage for every form of shopping addiction treatment, body image therapy and sex-change operations with mandatory mental health counseling, but not injuries from hunting accidents or smoking-related illnesses?
The Democrats compare their new health care bill to entitlements like Medicare and Medicaid. But those are welfare, not health care. They may go to deserving welfare recipients, but they are a government-enforced gift from the young to the old (Medicare), and from the middle class to the poor (Medicaid).
There’s no reason why most Americans shouldn’t be able to buy our own medical insurance the same way we buy our own cell phones, hair care and cars.
And just incidentally, Medicare and Medicaid are projected to go bankrupt slightly before the United States of America is projected to go bankrupt. So turning all of health care into a larger Medicare program may need a little more thinking through.
These programs will have to be reconfigured at some point, but how society takes care of the old and the poor should be put in a separate box from how the non-elderly and non-poor should obtain health care.
Democrats want to turn the entire citizenry into welfare recipients.
A few weeks ago, The New York Times ran an editorial noting the amazing fact that, by the middle of this year, there will be an estimated 6.8 billion people on Earth — and 5 billion will have cell phones! (Even more astounding, at least one of them is seated directly behind me every time I go to the movies.)
How did that happen without a Democrat president and Congress using bribes, parliamentary tricks and arcane non-voting maneuvers to pass a massive, hugely expensive National Cell Phone Reform Act?
How did that happen without Barney Frank and Henry Waxman personally designing the 3-foot-long, 26-pound, ugly green $4,000 cell phone we all have to use?
How did that happen without Obama signing the National Cell Phone Reform bill, as a poor 10-year-old black kid who couldn’t afford to text-message his friends looked on?
The reason nearly everyone in the universe has a cell phone is that President Reagan did to telephones the exac
Numbers Koutras


